Tag: LabourCourt
Exaggerating insubordination charges – emotion vs objectivity
The concept of insubordination means ‘refusal to obey a lawful and reasonable instruction’. Gross insubordination can be a ground for dismissal. However, the employer has the onus of proving that the act was, in fact, one of insubordination and that it was gross (very serious). An employer’s belief that insubordination has occurred can easily trigger an emotional response from the executive who issued the instruction.
Bonuses during protected strikes – understanding the legal position
Can employers pay bonuses to non-strikers during a protected strike? During a protected strike, tensions rise and both sides make difficult choices. This Alert explores the legal position by examining Solidarity obo C J Arendse and 38 Others vs Heineken Beverages (Pty) Ltd, a recent Labour Court judgment.
Non-payment of commissions – guidance for employers
The Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) entitles employees to certain minimum rights. These rights include remuneration for work done, leave and lunch breaks. Where the Department of Employment and Labour (DOEL) finds that an employer breaches an employee’s rights, it may issue a Compliance Order. The Labour Court can enforce this order. Non-payment of commission can also trigger regulatory and legal scrutiny.
Dismissal decisions require consistency
Unprotected strikes will often merit dismissal where the employer has not provoked them. However, even in the absence of provocation, dismissal may still be unfair. This distinction is critical for employers navigating strike-related discipline. One factor that can bedevil an employer’s case is inconsistency in the decision to dismiss.
Revisiting the boundaries of sexual harassment cases
On 12 September 2025, the Labour Court handed down judgment in Nedbank Limited vs Olwage and Others. The court set aside an arbitration award that had found the dismissal of a former employee substantively unfair. The judgment provides critical guidance on how decision-makers should assess harassment allegations. It also clarifies the role of arbitrators. Importantly, it reinforces the need for a victim-centred lens.



























