Tag: LabourAppealCourt

The Labour Appeal Court (LAC) has handed down a significant decision addressing a question that many employers and legal practitioners regularly confront. Can a disciplinary chairperson reject a lenient sanction emerging from a plea-bargaining process? The LAC answered this question in South African Police Services vs Mkonto and Others. The judgment also highlights the limits of leniency within disciplinary proceedings.

The Labour Appeal Court decision in Backsports (Pty) Ltd vs Motlhanke and another offers a useful reminder. Dismissal does not mark the end of an employer’s rights. This remains true where a restraint of trade was carefully agreed and clearly breached. For employers, the judgment reinforces several important lessons about enforcement, evidence and the limits of sympathy-based reasoning. In other words, it offers clarity in disputes that often resemble the fired and the furious, where emotions run high after termination.

Employers too often base appointment decisions on private agendas rather than employment policy. As a result, fairness to applicants suffers. Although management prerogative exists, the law limits its reach. It must operate within principles of reasonableness and fairness. Therefore, management decisions must rest on proven facts.