Tag: EmploymentLaw

One category of employees who are well protected under the Employment Equity Act (EEA) is those who are ill or injured. Employers cannot mistreat employees who are ill or injured. If they do, they risk serious consequences. This reality highlights the hidden cost of mistreating ill employees.

The Labour Appeal Court decision in Backsports (Pty) Ltd vs Motlhanke and another offers a useful reminder. Dismissal does not mark the end of an employer’s rights. This remains true where a restraint of trade was carefully agreed and clearly breached. For employers, the judgment reinforces several important lessons about enforcement, evidence and the limits of sympathy-based reasoning. In other words, it offers clarity in disputes that often resemble the fired and the furious, where emotions run high after termination.

The Essential Services Committee (ESC) has published a notice in terms of section 71, read with section 70(B)(1)(d) of the Labour Relations Act No 66 of 1995 (LRA). The notice announces an investigation into whether certain aviation services should be designated as essential services. The ESC published the notice on 23 January 2026. It arrives at a volatile moment for South Africa's aviation industry.

The Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) entitles employees to certain minimum rights. These rights include remuneration for work done, leave and lunch breaks. Where the Department of Employment and Labour (DOEL) finds that an employer breaches an employee’s rights, it may issue a Compliance Order. The Labour Court can enforce this order. Non-payment of commission can also trigger regulatory and legal scrutiny.

The Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) underwent significant amendments affecting employers and employees. On 23 January 2026, President Cyril Ramaphosa fixed commencement dates for most provisions. Selected sections were deferred to 1 February 2026 and 1 April 2026.

Unprotected strikes will often merit dismissal where the employer has not provoked them. However, even in the absence of provocation, dismissal may still be unfair. This distinction is critical for employers navigating strike-related discipline. One factor that can bedevil an employer’s case is inconsistency in the decision to dismiss.

On 12 September 2025, the Labour Court handed down judgment in Nedbank Limited vs Olwage and Others. The court set aside an arbitration award that had found the dismissal of a former employee substantively unfair. The judgment provides critical guidance on how decision-makers should assess harassment allegations. It also clarifies the role of arbitrators. Importantly, it reinforces the need for a victim-centred lens.

Section 187(2)(b) of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) provides that a dismissal may be fair if the employee has reached the normal or agreed retirement age. This means termination based on the employee’s age might not constitute unfair discrimination if the employee has reached retirement age.This distinction is important. It is crucial when considering dismissals that occur after an employee has passed retirement age.

Deciding to leave your job is a significant step, but knowing how to resign properly under South African law can make the difference between...