Tag: LegalEthics
Disciplinary hearings – fictitious AI case law has consequences
The courts take a dim view of hearing chairpersons who make findings that the facts presented do not support. They also disapprove of decisions based on non-existent case law. Such conduct raises serious concerns about the fairness, credibility and integrity of disciplinary proceedings. It also highlights the importance of sound legal reasoning and the responsible use of technology in legal processes.
