Tag: a quo
Are midstream reviews of proceedings at an investigative stage permissible?
Jean-Paul Rudd | Partner | Adams and Adams | mail me |
An appeal serving before a full bench in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria...
Judge settles old debate – mining rights and indirect change of...
A recent Supreme Court judgment has clarified that ministerial consent under section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) is needed for both direct and indirect changes of control of a company that holds mining rights.
