Site icon bbrief

SURVEY | Ethical sentiment among professional South Africans drop sharply!


Dr Claudelle von Eck | CEO | Institute of Internal Auditors South Africa (IIA SA) | Chair | Anti-Intimidation and Ethical Practices Forum (AEPF)mail me |


Following a bruising year of corporate scandals, the AEPF Ethical Practices Survey 2018 reveals 1 in 4 believe financial success is more important than doing the right thing – while 25% in public sector say they fear for their lives when reporting wrongdoing.

Ethics is not prioritised enough in corporate South Africa. And, according to a wide-ranging survey conducted in both the private and public sectors, the country’s leaders are failing us.

These are just some of the findings of the 2018 AEPF Ethical Practices Survey. The annual survey – the first was conducted last year – serves as a barometer and quantitative tool to capture ‘the perceptions of professionals regarding ethical practices in society, organisations and professional institutions’.

An initiative of the Anti-Intimidation and Ethical Practices Forum (AEPF), the 30-page report reveals how unethical behaviour is perceived by professionals in the governance, auditing, risk management, fraud management and ethical practices domain in South Africa.

The AEPF is a forum of professional bodies and other like-minded organisations formed two years ago following the rising levels of corruption, fraud, ethics failures and lack of corporate governance in the country.

It was established to assist professionals who experience intimidation and whistleblowers keen to expose unethical behaviour in the workplace.

It’s founding members include the Institute of Internal Auditors SA (IIA SA), Corruption Watch, the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA), the Institute of Directors Southern Africa, the Ethics Institute, the SA Institute of Professional Accountants (SAIPA), the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) and the .

The results of the ethics survey, meanwhile, show a sharp decline in perceptions as compared to the inaugural study. This year 1,900 professionals from across corporate South Africa participated with the largest group working at an executive level (28% compared to 10% in 2017) with the second largest coming from middle management level (21% compared to 19% in 2017).

The majority of the responses were from the private sector while at least 32% who participated work in the banking and financial services sector.

Key findings

Leaders in the private sector have taken a substantial fall from grace in the past year which explains why the respondents significantly downgraded their perceptions in the ethical nature of their leaders.

Not all negative

However, that there is some heartening data to emanate from the survey.

Despite the negative sentiment around leaders in the private sector, the perception of ethics remains relatively high, with no significant shifts. Of the respondents in the private sector 78% agree that ethics is a priority in their organisation, 80% agree that talking about ethics is encouraged, 80% agree that people are encouraged to do the right thing and 80% agree that people are encouraged to report unethical behaviour.

The results also revealed that the perception of ethics in professional institutions remain very high. For example, 83% in the public sector and 87% in the private sector agree that these bodies have ethical leadership – and 86% in the public sector and 88% in the private sector agree that these bodies are ethical. This is the only dimension where both sectors seem to be in agreement in their positive sentiment.

In both sectors there seems to be an increase in trust in professional institutions.

In the public sector, 47% agree that they preferred to report unethical behaviour to their professional body and not to their organisation, as compared to 38% in 2017. In the private sector the percentage that agree is 31% compared to 24% in 2017. It must be noted, however, that while this increase in trust in professional bodies is good for their reputation, it does not signal comfort in the leadership in the respondents organisations.

DOWNLOAD | FULL REPORT |


 

Exit mobile version